HR 6048 119th Congress
NDO Fairness Act of 2025
To amend title 18, United States Code, to modify delayed notice requirements, and for other purposes.
Official Title as Introduced Congress.gov
Open official Congress.gov recordSource-linked procedural record
Bill journey
This is a chronology, not a progress score. Politically.com does not classify stages or infer what comes next. Records sharing a date are grouped because not every source field supplies a time.
-
Introduction Congress.gov
Introduced
Introduced in the House.
Open bill recordOfficial action Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Open bill recordOfficial action Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Open bill recordOfficial action Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Open bill recordText version Congress.gov
Introduced in House
A dated text-version record is available.
Open text record -
Official action Congress.gov
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Open bill record -
Official action Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Open bill recordOfficial action Congress.gov
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Open bill record -
Text version Congress.gov
Engrossed in House
A dated text-version record is available.
Open text recordOfficial action Congress.gov · 4:16 pm UTC
Mr. Fitzgerald moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Open bill recordOfficial action Congress.gov · 4:16 pm UTC
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5266-5268)
Open bill recordOfficial action Congress.gov · 4:16 pm UTC
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6048.
Open bill recordOfficial action Congress.gov · 4:29 pm UTC
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5266-5267)
Open bill recordOfficial action Congress.gov · 4:29 pm UTC
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
Open bill recordOfficial action Congress.gov · 4:29 pm UTC
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Open bill record
View the complete bill journey as an accessible table
| Date and time | Record | Official detail | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| IntroductionIntroduced | Introduced in the House. | Congress.gov | |
| Official actionReferred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. | No additional detail supplied.IntroReferral · House floor actions · Code H11100 | Congress.gov | |
| Official actionIntroduced in House | No additional detail supplied.IntroReferral · Library of Congress · Code Intro-H | Congress.gov | |
| Official actionIntroduced in House | No additional detail supplied.IntroReferral · Library of Congress · Code 1000 | Congress.gov | |
| Text versionIntroduced in House | A dated text-version record is available. | Congress.gov | |
| Official actionCommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held | No additional detail supplied.Committee · House committee actions · Code H15001 | Congress.gov | |
| Official actionOrdered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote. | No additional detail supplied.Committee · House committee actions · Code H19000 | Congress.gov | |
| Official actionCommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held | No additional detail supplied.Committee · House committee actions · Code H15001 | Congress.gov | |
| Text versionEngrossed in House | A dated text-version record is available. | Congress.gov | |
| Official actionMr. Fitzgerald moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended. | No additional detail supplied.Floor · House floor actions · Code H30300 | Congress.gov | |
| Official actionConsidered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5266-5268) | No additional detail supplied.Floor · House floor actions · Code H30000 | Congress.gov | |
| Official actionDEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6048. | No additional detail supplied.Floor · House floor actions · Code H8D000 | Congress.gov | |
| Official actionOn motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5266-5267) | No additional detail supplied.Floor · House floor actions · Code H37300 | Congress.gov | |
| Official actionPassed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. | No additional detail supplied.Floor · Library of Congress · Code 8000 | Congress.gov | |
| Official actionMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. | No additional detail supplied.Floor · House floor actions · Code H38310 | Congress.gov |
House roll calls join only on matching Congress, legislation type, and number. Senate roll calls join only on matching source-supplied document type and number, not question text. Committee and related-measure relationships have no date in their relationship records and therefore are counted above but never placed on the chronology.
Congressional Research Service
CRS summary
NDO Fairness Act This bill increases the requirements the government must meet to obtain a nondisclosure order (NDO) under the Stored Communications Act (SCA).The SCA generally prohibits providers of remote computing services or electronic communication services (providers) from disclosing stored electronic communications or records (e.g., emails) or information pertaining to customers or subscribers. However, the SCA authorizes the government seek a warrant, order, or subpoena to compel providers to disclose electronic communications or records or information pertaining to customers or subscribers during an investigation. Providers may notify customers and subscribers of the warrant, order, or subpoena unless the government obtains a court order—an NDO—that delays the notification.This bill raises the standard the government must meet to obtain (or extend) an NDO. The bill also requires the court, before issuing an NDO, to issue a written determination that the standard was met based on specific and articulable facts, and to review the underlying warrant, order, or subpoena. The bill requires NDOs to be narrowly tailored. It also limits their duration to 90 days for most investigations, though it permits a duration of up to one year for investigations pertaining to an offense involving child pornography or sexual exploitation of children.Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on data related to NDOs, including the number of customers or subscribers targeted; applications for orders; orders granted, extended, or denied; and orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.
Official documents
Text versions
- Engrossed in HouseAug 31, 2026
- Introduced in HouseNov 17, 2025