INFB is supportive of appropriations language that would cap the H-2A AEWR and limit the ability to enforce a 2023 DOL rule regarding H-2A occupations on farm. Getting this language passed through in the upcoming appropriations bill would provide farmers that depend on H-2A labor the certainty they need to continue their operation in a way that doesnt include continues exorbitant wage raises.
2025 · 4th Quarter (Oct 1 - Dec 31)
INDIANA FARM BUREAU, INC.
Filed by INDIANA FARM BUREAU, INC.
Open official filingSource-reported fields
Filing overview
- Type
- 4th Quarter - Report
- Posted
- Jan 20, 2026
- Income
- Not reported
- Expenses
- $50,000.00
- Registrant
- INDIANA FARM BUREAU, INC
- Filing UUID
- 84207968-8b78-48c7-9186-665f98450d44
- Termination date
- Not reported
Expense method: A
Literal source text
Lobbying issues and bill citations
President Trumps ongoing and changing plan for tariffs causes concern with farmers that are often the first to feel pressure from trade/tariff differences. While trade negotiations can be beneficial to our members, a long term trade battle could have negative impacts on our members.
INFB is adamant about being a part of the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) conversation. So far, agriculture has not been brought into the MAHA conversation, but, in several ways, has been identified as a part of the problem. INFB believes that Ag must be at the table to be a part of the MAHA solution.
INFB supports the passage of a 5-year farm bill. While several farm bill programs were signed into law with H.R.1, there are still several farm bill priorities that were not passed. INFB supports the passage of a farm bill that covers these lingering programs before the September 30th deadline. INFB Supports the Farmer Bridge Assistance (FBA) Program and appreciates the $12B that was given to the program. INFB will continue to advocate for additional funds to assist farmers through this difficult economic time.
Literal federal measure citations: H.R.1
Relationship and amount limits
Bill links use only the filing year’s mathematically derived Congress plus the literal measure type and number in the issue description. Unmatched citations remain plain text. Politically.com does not join on names, infer advocacy positions, combine amendments, or calculate totals across filings.