Skip to content
Politically.com Search all
Menu

California 20252026

AB 2231

California Environmental Quality Act: hospital projects.

Source: Open States / PluralUpdated 2026-09-12 13:12:55 UTC.

Official record

Measure details

Jurisdiction
California
Session
20252026
Chamber
lower
Classification
bill
Subjects
CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct, hospitalprojects
Introduced / first action
2026-02-19 00:00:00

Alternate titles

  • California Environmental Quality Act: administrative and judicial procedures.

Source-supplied abstracts

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA establishes administrative procedures for the review and certification of the EIR for a project and judicial review procedures for any action or proceeding brought to challenge the lead agency's decision to certify the EIR or to grant project approvals. This bill would establish streamlined procedures for the administrative and judicial review of the environmental review and approvals granted for an environmental leadership hospital campus project, defined by the bill as a construction project of a hospital campus in the City of Santa Clara, under certain conditions. The bill would require the city council of the City of Santa Clara to certify the project for the streamlined judicial review, as specified, if it finds the project will meet those conditions. The bill would require the applicant of the environmental leadership hospital campus project to take certain actions in order for those specified procedures to apply to the project. The bill would require a certified project to meet certain labor requirements. The bill would require the Judicial Council, on or before July 1, 2027, to adopt rules of court establishing procedures requiring actions or proceedings seeking judicial review of the certification of an environmental impact report for a certified environmental leadership hospital campus project or the granting of any project approval, including any appeals to the court of appeal or the Supreme Court, to be resolved, to the extent feasible, within 270 calendar days of the filing of the certified record of proceedings with the court. The bill would require the lead agency to concurrently prepare the record of proceedings with the environmental review, as provided. Because the bill would impose additional duties on a local agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of Santa Clara. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Sponsors

Source-supplied history

Actions

  1. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

    executive-receipt
  2. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0.).

    amendment-passage, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
  3. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  4. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0.).

    passage, reading-1, reading-3
  5. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1, reading-2, reading-3
  6. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    amendment-passage, reading-1, reading-2, reading-3
  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1, reading-2, reading-3
  8. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

    committee-passage, reading-1, reading-2
  9. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable, referral-committee
  10. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable, referral-committee
  11. Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and JUD.

    referral-committee
  12. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1, referral-committee
  13. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 70. Noes 1. Page 5005.)

    passage, reading-1, reading-3
  14. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1, reading-2, reading-3
  15. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 6).

    committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
  16. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee
  17. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-passage, reading-1, reading-2
  18. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 20).

    amendment-introduction, amendment-passage, committee-passage, referral-committee
  19. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

    referral-committee
  20. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction, amendment-passage, committee-passage, reading-1, reading-2, referral-committee
  21. Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

    referral-committee
  22. From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  23. Read first time. To print.

    reading-1