Skip to content
Politically.com Search all
Menu

California 20252026

AB 2727

Corrections: parole and prerelease treatment.

Source: Open States / PluralUpdated 2026-09-12 13:12:55 UTC.

Official record

Measure details

Jurisdiction
California
Session
20252026
Chamber
lower
Classification
bill
Subjects
Corrections, paroleandprereleasetreatment
Introduced / first action
2026-02-20 00:00:00

Alternate titles

  • Courts.

Source-supplied abstracts

Existing law requires the Board of Parole Hearings, among other responsibilities, to conduct parole suitability hearings and determine whether an individual is suitable for parole. Existing law establishes the Elderly Parole Program for the purpose of reviewing parole suitability of inmates who are 50 years of age or older and who have served a minimum of 20 years of continuous incarceration on their sentence. Existing law requires the Board of Parole Hearings, when considering the release of qualifying inmates, to give special consideration to whether certain criteria have reduced the elderly inmate's risk for future violence. Existing law excludes various persons from these provisions, including persons sentenced pursuant to existing sentencing provisions commonly known as the 3 strikes law. Under an existing court order, although statutorily excluded, an individual may be eligible for parole under the Elderly Parole Program when they are 60 years of age or older and have been continuously incarcerated for at least 25 years. This bill would instead specify that persons convicted of various sexual offenses, including rape, sodomy, or aggravated sexual assault of a child, or sentenced pursuant to a provision applicable where the crimes involved had multiple victims, as specified, are not eligible for parole under the Elderly Parole Program, unless the person is 65 years of age or older and has served a minimum of 25 years of continuous incarceration on their current sentence. The bill would require the board to review a sexual dangerousness screening of an individual sentenced to an indeterminate sentence for a sexually violent offense, as defined, and would require the board to refer a person whose sexual dangerousness screening indicates that they may qualify as a sexually violent predator to the State Department of State Hospitals for further evaluation, as described. The bill would require commissioners who conduct hearings to undergo training in sex offender behaviors and risks. Existing law defines a sexually violent predator to mean a person who has been convicted of a sexually violent offense against one or more victims and who has a diagnosed mental disorder that makes the person a danger to the health and safety of others in that it is likely that the person will engage in sexually violent criminal behavior. For purposes of this definition, a conviction for a sexually violent offense includes convictions that resulted in either a determinate or an indeterminate prison sentence, as specified. Existing law requires the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to refer a person who is in custody under that department's jurisdiction, and who is serving a determinate sentence or whose parole has been revoked, for evaluation by the State Department of State Hospitals at least 6 months prior to that individual's scheduled date for release from prison if the secretary determines that the person may be a sexually violent predator. Existing law requires a petition for commitment as a sexually violent predator to be filed in the county in which the person was convicted of the sexual offense for which the person was committed to the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. This bill would also require the Executive Officer of the Board of Parole Hearings to make that referral and revise the criteria for referral to additionally apply to a person who is serving an indeterminate prison sentence. The bill would also authorize the secretary, or the Executive Officer of the Board of Parole Hearings, to refer the person for evaluation if the person's scheduled release date is less than 4 months after the date of the decision to grant parole, or if the person will be scheduled for a parole hearing in the next 6 months. By imposing additional duties on counties regarding commitment of persons as sexually violent predators, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Sponsors

Source-supplied history

Actions

  1. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 69. Noes 0.).

    amendment-passage, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
  2. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  3. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0.).

    passage, reading-1, reading-3
  4. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1, reading-2, reading-3
  5. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    amendment-passage, reading-1, reading-2, reading-3
  6. From committee: That the measure be returned to Senate Floor for consideration. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 27)

    committee-passage
  7. From committee: Pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10 that the measure be re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (August 26).

    committee-passage, referral-committee
  8. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10 (b). (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

    committee-passage, referral-committee
  9. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10 (b).

    referral-committee
  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1, reading-2, reading-3
  11. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    amendment-passage, reading-1, reading-2, reading-3
  12. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1, reading-2, reading-3
  13. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 13).

    committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
  14. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee
  15. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable, referral-committee
  16. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

    referral-committee
  17. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1, referral-committee
  18. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 70. Noes 0. Page 5531.)

    passage, reading-1, reading-3
  19. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1, reading-2, reading-3
  20. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (May 14).

    committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
  21. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee
  22. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee
  23. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-passage, reading-1, reading-2
  24. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 7).

    amendment-introduction, amendment-passage, committee-passage, referral-committee
  25. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

    referral-committee
  26. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction, amendment-passage, committee-passage, reading-1, reading-2, referral-committee
  27. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

    referral-committee
  28. From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  29. Read first time. To print.

    reading-1